Posted on Leave a comment

The decline of hunting for sport

Living my whole life in Wyoming, western Colorado, South Dakota and now Arizona, it’s been hard for me to think of hunting as relatively unpopular. Outside of larger cities in those states, I’ve always been in a small minority as a vegetarian, even among those who care for wild life.

Working at a gunpowder factory, I heard everything from stories of deer hunting at the tragic poaching of a Big Horn sheep to threats of shooting crows settled on the buildings. Growing up, I heard plenty of people in high school talk of plinking away at prairie dogs for fun and the moral rectitude of killing coyotes merely for being coyotes.

But things have changed from my early childhood until now. Vegetarian restaurants are more common and even in the most meat and potato bar and grills, it’s common to have a veggie burger on the menu.

So it’s perhaps not entirely surprising that hunting is on decline. According to a 2010 report cited in the New York Times, the US Fish & Wildlife Service has seen a decline in hunting in 33 states over two decades, the greatest being a decline of 50 percent in Massachusetts. The decline was measured in sales of hunting licenses. The sale of hunting licenses is usually the main funding for state agencies that manage wildlife and many public lands. According to NPR, licenses and taxes on hunting and fishing equipment provide about 60 percent of funding for state wildlife agencies. Hunters require land to hunt on that is also used by birders, hikers, mountain bikers, climbers and campers.

 

Along with the continued decline in hunting outlined in the 2016 US Fish & Wildlife Service report is an increase in fishing and wildlife viewing. 40 percent of Americans participated in some form of wildlife viewing in 2016. There were 35.8 million anglers fishing in the US in 2016, with an increase of 8 percent from 2011 to 2016. There were only 11.5 million hunters cited in the report but an amazing 86.0 million wildlife viewers.

Beyond wildlife recreation, there are plenty of other nature related, outdoor activities. Rock climbing, mountain biking, kayaking, casual hiking or even back packing aren’t necessarily wildlife related activities. The numbers also don’t include people collecting wild mushrooms or flowers.

Hunters are quick to point out their importance, especially how hunting revenue has paid for restoration of wildlife. The other side of the story of course is that hunting decimated wildlife to begin with. Another complicating detail is that often hunters and advocate groups flex political muscle, making wildlife management what they want it to be. Big Horn sheep were reintroduced into the Santa Catalina mountains north of Tucson, but when mountain lions preyed on the sheep, they were killed by Arizona Game and Fish. There are other places were sheep were introduced to places with little to no historical evidence of their previous existence. Mountain Lions were again killed to protect populations of bighorns introduced largely because of hunter advocacy. Moose were introduced near my hometown of Grand Junction Colorado in a place they’d never lived before largely to satisfy the desire of locals to hunt moose. Of course, the idea is also to bring in outsiders and their money in moose hunts. The overall effect is that when it comes to decisions over wildlife, hunters have a disproportionate sway on policy.

Ring Neck Pheasants are native to Asia but exist all over the United States due largely to the desire of hunters to kill them. According to the New York Times piece, a spending cut of $1 million on Pheasant repopulation was noted for the state of Pennsylvania. It’s hard to imagine how a cut in money used to repopulate a non-native bird population will negatively hurt anyone besides hunters and the pheasant numbers.

Statistica.com shows an increase in Americans surveyed who said they went hiking or backpacking in the last 12 months. In the spring of 2008, 29.23 million people said they went hiking, that number grew to 47.2 million people in 2017.

A study done by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources in August 2014 showed that there is a statistically significant difference in attitudes between hunters and non-hunters on wolves. Non-hunters had a significantly better view of wolves than hunters. In my experience, this difference in views also extends to mountain lions, deer and coyotes.

As hunting declines in popularity, it seems that state wildlife management will become less necessary, or at the very least, it’s goals should change. With less pheasant hunters, there should be less spent on pheasant introduction (if it should ever have been spent to begin with). With less deer hunters, wolves become more important to maintain deer in reasonable numbers, and if the Wisconsin survey is to be believed, attitudes may be more positive towards wolves.

Hunting arguably does play an important role in environmentalism. Hunters were some of the first and strongest advocates for wildlife and land conservation, but they also kept land as they wanted it, not necessarily as it was. Hunting is also one of the few direct ways to interact with a landscape, to be part of a wild ecology. Perhaps hunting should remain for those who want to participate, but that doesn’t mean they should set up the environment to favor them. Hunting, if it remains, should be a matter of participating in a wilder environment and sharing it with birders, hikers, climbers and anglers.

Posted on Leave a comment

Why indeginous hunting is crucial to forest sustainability?

A lot of us consider the Amazon as an untouched wildreness, but humans had been thriving in those diverse environments for millennia. Due to this lengthy records, the information that Indigenous and woodland groups bypass among generations approximately plants, animals and forest ecology is especially rich and unique and without difficulty dwarfs that of any expert.
For one component, Indigenous humans see animals and human beings as fundamental to nature. This holistic view is regularly lacking in present day, science-based totally forest governance and conservation strategies, which tend to cognizance completely on woodland cover.


In my Silent Forest Project I’m investigating how Indigenous groups in Colombia observe conventional ecological understanding in natural world control. Primarily based on my studies to this point, I would really like to argue that subsistence looking, and the conventional ecological understanding that courses and regulates it, must be identified as a key woodland-control approach.
Manifestly hunting of untamed animals is unpopular amongst conservationists, and meaningless poaching for extraordinary pets and animal elements can by no means be justified. However, in many regions round the arena, Indigenous and woodland groups have hunted, and continue to hunt, for subsistence. For them hunting is not a recreation or a leisure hobby. It’s a meals source and a way to balance animal populations. So, even though it could sound paradoxical in the beginning, hunting can definitely toughen long-time period environmental control, as it’s how Indigenous and forest groups investigate woodland fitness and meet their meals-security and livelihood wishes. It’s additionally why Indigenous and wooded area communities often have a vested hobby in healthful forests and thriving natural wildlife.
At the same time, there’s an growing hazard of over hunting and commercialization, each through Indigenous and woodland groups themselves and via the people who stay inside the vicinity or come for enterprise. Presently it’s enormously clean to shop for wild meat in neighborhood markets, although it’s illegal to promote meat sourced from wild animals in maximum Amazonian countries.

It’s likely that the size of searching and trade of untamed meat within the Amazon is large. Overhunting should be a situation, now not only for the sake of biodiversity conservation, but because big mammals and birds, like tapirs, deer, wooly monkeys or curassows, disperse seeds of many tropical tree species, playing essential ecological role within the woodland meals webs.

Due to the fact this interest is unlawful, the commercialization of wild meat goes in large part unmonitored. only a few research have attempted to quantify its extent, though there’s nevertheless a scarcity of facts.
Definitely searching is a leverage point for effective wooded area governance, however it does require careful balancing.

What gets Measured receives done

This suggests how unmanaged subsistence looking, in aggregate with illegality of change in wild meat, can create uncontrollable situations, wherein humans nevertheless hunt and sell their trap but do so in secret and without reporting portions or which species they hunt. This complicates monitoring and assessment, making flora and fauna management unruly and the reputable information unreliable.
It additionally opens up troubles associated with justice: Indigenous human beings are regularly marginalized by means of nation government, and their traditional styles of management are much less regularly implemented.

Meanwhile lifestyles inside the Amazon location is converting. New market dynamics, environmental laws, cultural changes and lack of conventional ecological know-how inside the international locations that proportion the Amazon all affect wildlife.
On one hand, meals choices amongst Indigenous people appear to be transferring. Younger human beings are losing interest in hunting, and lots of look for jobs and possibilities in the towns.
However, the location is going through speedy development and country wide economic regulations frequently see forest lands and resources for value extraction, which generates conflicts with Indigenous rights. The new waves of onslaught particularly strike the attention in Brazil, however manifest in most Amazonian international locations. Monetary improvement attracts many non-Indigenous settlers who come to paintings in mining or agriculture and do not have sensitive ecological know-how or take care of nature but like to devour wild meat or hunt for leisure purposes.

The Dawning of the Indigenous Regime
These kind of hyperlinks need to be better studied and understood. But, in these situations of fast alternate and excessive uncertainty, we should make the quality of what we have. That includes the conventional ecological information of Indigenous people and wooded area communities.
In reality, the ones communities could assist screen the natural wildlife and help the layout of truthful, equitable and effective natural wildlife and forest project, as well as its implementation.

Posted on Leave a comment

Approval of lion trophy reignites trophy hunting sport debate

A lion trophy from Tanzania has been accepted for import to America, the primary such case considering that lions started receiving protections in January 2016 as a threatened species below the Endangered Species Act, a conservation institution says.

Documents received with the aid of the center for organic variety via a Freedom of facts Act Request and shared with CNN on Thursday display the hunter, Carl Atkinson, became represented with the aid of attorney John Jackson III, a member of the indoors branch’s personal Worldwide Wildlife Conservation Council, a debatable panel convened to advocate on how trophy searching enables conservation.

The group also says the findings in the documents recommend the Trump management is making ready to approve the importation of different species — along with elephants — from Tanzania. Consistent with the documents, the trophy, which turned into accredited for import to the USA among July 11 and August 8, can not be bought in the US.

The Trump management had previously signaled an openness to allowing a few huge game trophy imports on a “case-by means of-case” foundation, figuring out an trouble that cut up President Donald Trump and his interior branch in 2017. The decision to permit some imports got here after public backlash to the rollback of Obama-era restrictions on uploading trophies of elephants and lions from a few African nations by the indoors department’s Fish and wildlife carrier.

The Fish and Natural world service said in a assertion that it’s miles “making findings for trophy imports on an software-by-application foundation.”

“Prison, properly-regulated looking as a part of a valid control application can gain the conservation of certain species by way of offering incentives to neighborhood communities to preserve the species and by setting plenty-wanted revenue back into conservation,” the declaration study. “In response to a D.C. Circuit court opinion, the U.S. Fish and flora and fauna carrier has revised its method for assessing packages to import sure hunted species. we’ve got withdrawn our country wide enhancement findings for quite a number species across several nations of their area, the carrier is making findings for trophy imports on an application-with the aid of-application foundation.”

Tanya Sanerib, the worldwide legal director for the center, advised CNN that the approval “is tragic news for lion conservation, and it suggests that the Trump management can also soon open the floodgates to trophy imports from Tanzania.”

“Tanzania is a lion stronghold, however it’s been criticized by scientists for corruption and inadequate wildlife protections. starting the USA marketplace to these imports doesn’t bode nicely for the lion kings of Tanzania,” she added.

An American hunter confronted backlash after he turned into granted a permit to import a black rhino he killed in Namibia as a part of a looking ride. The hunter was represented by means of Jackson. The attorney believes his institution is ultimately doing more to defend animals, claiming hunting promotes healthy populations in the wild.

Posted on Leave a comment

Utah Wildlife Board hikes cougar trying to find 4th year despite warnings from natural world advocates

The Utah Wildlife Board boosted cougar searching quotas Thursday for the fourth 12 months in a row, balloting to hike allows for the upcoming season to 690, representing approximately a quarter of the kingdom’s lion population.

Critics say that stage of hunting stress is not sustainable, but department of wildlife assets biologists said they have got recorded consistent increases in cougar numbers within the beyond few years despite better harvests. Cougars’ population increase tracked with profits in Utah’s mule deer herds, said Darren DeBloois, DWR’s sport mammals coordinator.

DWR surveys imply the country has 2,seven-hundred mountain lions, more than double the entire in 2007.

“Our goal is to keep a healthy cougar populace in the current distribution of the species across Utah, at the same time as also considering human and farm animals safety, in addition to the health of other wildlife species that cougars prey on,” DeBloois stated. “As a part of this, we factor in a percentage of older age animals, breeding females and healthy cougars inside the population.”

The board unanimously agreed with DeBloois’ extended harvest guidelines, although it tinkered with some of the numbers in precise looking units wherein board members felt extra or fewer cougar takes are in order. It approved an increase of forty six permits over ultimate 12 months — and 12 more than the division recommended — but the usual number of cougars killed with the aid of hunters will now not possibly attain 690.

“Cougars are difficult to hunt,” DeBloois stated.

At the equal assembly, the board voted to reduce searching stress at the cougar’s smaller cousin because recent harvest statistics factors to troubling signs in Utah’s bobcat population. It capped the overall quantity of bobcat permits bought at eighty% of final 12 months’s, permitting a maximum of 6,460.

“Lower bobcat population numbers may be related to the lower in the range of rabbits in the nation,” DeBloois stated.

However it become the cougar quotas that generated the most ardour at Thursday’s assembly.

The circulate to increase looking opportunities for the massive cats got here over the objections of many “nonconsumptive” natural world fans who insisted it disregards sound science to soothe ranchers and huge-game hunters who see cougar predation as a chance to their livelihoods.

Jean Tabin, a Salt Lake town ophthalmologist, fears Utah’s cougar population is drawing close a “tipping point” within the face of hunting levels that greater than double what natural world specialists say is suitable for maintaining a healthy population.

Posted on Leave a comment

Trophy hunting-A kind of sport hunting polar bears

TROPHY hunters posed for sordid memento snaps subsequent to the corpses of the white polar bears they killed.

Some of the majestic bears were slaughtered within the Canadian region of the Arctic Circle as a part of a “memorable” 12-day £36k looking ride.

Corporations provide rich hunters tours wherein they’ll have some of wealthy animals to butcher and add to their “trophy collections”.

Nebraska-based worldwide Trophy Adventures has a suggestion permitting customers to “return for some other 10 days if a polar endure isn’t always taken”, the mirror mentioned.

The organization stated on its internet site: “Hunting is executed on the sea ice in top areas.

“Offerings of an Inuit polar bear guide with a group is supplied via the period of the hunt.

“The search ends when a undergo is harvested.”

Describing how the animals can be cleaned for adornment, some other firm, satisfactory Hunts says on its internet site: “Your cover, skull and baculum bone can be shipped frozen by means of a ­encouraged Canadian taxidermist.

“There it will likely be fleshed, cleaned, well salted and tanned. as soon as properly prepared, your conceal may be saved for many years.”

The journeys are reportedly adored via thousands, with one customer, commenting: “The experience of this hunt is nearly past phrases.

“My hunt turned into successful as I took a pleasing polar endure. I had a lot a laugh that I’m going again in 2020.”

In Canada, it’s miles legal to purchase a licence to kill polar bears, regardless of their uncertain future.

The Inuit community in Canada promote licences for blood sports, at the same time as killing the animals to apply as garb and meals.

The World Wildlife Fund suggested that there are handiest up to 25,000 polar bears left in the wild.

And the populace can be slashed with the aid of 1/3 if the Arctic continues to warm.

The Global Union for Conservation of Nature, classifies them as inclined, this means that they’re at excessive threat of endangerment in the wild.

Posted on Leave a comment

Hunting tourism is killing natural habitats

Searching tourism may be a deeply controversial subject matter, but for conservationists in Namibia, the profitable enterprise is important for the improvement of nearby groups
A land of amazing wildlife, rugged terrain and rich subculture, safari-looking for tourists were flocking to Africa for countless years. in keeping with the African development bank, in 2015 alone the continent attracted a document-breaking one thousand million visitors, making tourism one among its quickest developing industries. The tens of millions generated through tourism revenue every 12 months no longer handiest provide a lift to nearby economies, they also provide vital guide for conservation efforts and protection of the ‘huge five’.


Apparently contradictory to these dreams, searching in Africa is one of the most worthwhile kinds of tourism. Albeit hotly debated, there’s a controversy that criminal, well-regulated and sustainable looking practices can promote conservation and aid the development of rural groups. The desolate tract-covered kingdom of Namibia, as an example, has signed directly to this contentious scheme, and consequently has seen its populations of endangered animals flourish.
Within the face of vociferous animal rights activists projecting anti-hunting rhetoric across social media, Namibia has validated that, with the proper structures in location, conservation and searching tourism may not be such ordinary bedfellows in the end.

The concept of searching to encourage conservation appears antithetical, however, as AJ DeRosa, a sustainability hunter and creative Director of risky Cow Publishing, advised enterprise locations: “The concept of hunting something to store something is not a miles-fetched concept: North america’s whole conservation model is constructed on it.”
Searching animals attaches a sure financial worth to them, which therefore increases the price in their natural habitat. This in turn creates an financial incentive for landowners to shield their surroundings. equally, it prevents the land from being advanced for agriculture, which, as WWF stresses on its website, “might be the greatest threat to the kind of existence on the earth today”.
Moreover, human-animal conflict is reduced whilst landowners placed greater attempt into shielding the borders of their houses. as an example, whilst game animals wander onto farmland, they may be regularly killed with a view to protect plants and livestock. that is no one-of-a-kind from ‘trouble animals’ everywhere in the global, defined DeRosa: “we’ve bears out west that will become cattle killers, and when they grow to be livestock killers, if the locals don’t exit and kill them, the fish and game branch will.”

Therefore, as Maxi Louis, Director of the Namibian affiliation of community guide organisations, mentioned: “hunting in one form or any other will always be necessary.” Mirroring DeRosa’s argument, she endured: “as an example, while a lion terrorises a village and kills home inventory, or there may be an over-abundance of a species.”
Louis’ 2nd factor is a salient one, and turned into added to the fore within the aftermath of the killing of Cecil the lion in 2015. The circulation of anti-hunting rhetoric sparked via the tom cat’s sensationalist dying deterred large recreation hunters from touring to Zimbabwe, wherein Cecil changed into killed.

As a end result, the lion populace in the US, developing an unsustainable state of affairs in which other species, consisting of wild dogs and leopards, have been devastated through the overpowering numbers of predatory big cats. The conservancy in Zimbabwe changed into compelled to cull masses of lions to restore stability back to the environment.
The irony, consequently, in the back of the sector spreading the emotive tale of Cecil is that, by using perpetuating anti-searching sentiment, more numbers of lions have been in the end killed.

Posted on Leave a comment

Do hunting animals sports really save animals?

When Mozambique lost more than half of the elephants due to hunting since 2009, the WB’s decision to sponsor this sport was questioned: Is hunting the best way to save animals? Standing on the edge of genocide?
At the end of 2014, the World Bank funded US $ 46 million to Mozambique – one of the poorest countries in the world – to develop tourism and reduce poverty, of which US $ 700,000 was dedicated to elephant hunting and monks death. Meanwhile, elephant poaching takes ivory to serve the black market in Asia, causing the number of elephants in Mozambique to decline dramatically. According to a survey by the Wildlife Conservation Association (WCS), during the period of 2009-2014, the number of elephants decreased from about 20,000 to only 10,300 individuals.
Mozambique and many poor countries in Africa such as South Africa, Namibia, Angola, Zimbabwe and Tanzania have long considered sport hunting as a financial support for wildlife protection, despite the fact that The rhino in Zimbabwe still has not escaped extinction in 2013. In contrast, Botswana and Kenya have decided to ban large-scale animal hunting against the decline in the number of elephants and animals in these two countries. The view that animal hunting is a conservation strategy still faces mixed opinions.

According to a spokesman for the World Bank, if it is possible to rationally control and share benefits with communities in and around the national park area, animal hunting will be an important tool for sustainable governance of protected areas. survival and natural resources.

However, many others argue that profit from the hunting industry is not enough to motivate poor communities, especially in the context of corruption in some countries. According to the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW), in the face of serious illegal hunting, organizations like the World Bank should realize that killing animals is a wrong, unethical and unethical act. cannot be considered conservation.

With funding from the World Bank, Mozambique issued 80 elephant hunting licenses every year for a price of US $ 11,000, and 55-60 lion hunting licenses for a unit price of US $ 4,000. However, the community around the reserve only receives 20% of the profits, the rest flows into the pockets of the Mozambique government.

The idea of ​​sustainable use of wildlife has been addressed in the Convention on Biological Diversity – a treaty aimed at developing national strategies for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. Accordingly, people are allowed to collect benefits from animals provided that they do not affect the number of individuals and their habitats.

However, some conservationists debated the concept of “sustainable use” in animal hunting. A typical example is the Dallas Safari Club, where an extremely dangerous black rhino auction license in Namibia has just joined the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Accordingly, $ 350,000 earned from buyers will be transferred directly to a conservation fund in Namibia. This is considered the worst way to allow hunting to hide under the voice of conservation.

Posted on Leave a comment

The Japanese whale hunting industry is being controversial

For Japanese people who work as whales, July 1 has a very important meaning, because it is the day Japan lifted its ban on trade in whales after 31 years. As soon as the ban was lifted, five Japanese fishing vessels went out to sea and brought back the first two whales since 1986. They were then cut to auction at the market.

During the ceremony before the whale fishing boat set sail, Yoshifumi Kai, chairman of the Japanese Whale Association, said: “I am deeply moved. My heart is trembling.”

Japan on June 30 withdrew from the International Whale Commission (IWC), approved a whaling trade ban in 1986. Since then, Japan has still caught more than 300 whales each. year, but to “serve scientific research”.

Many Japanese fishermen seem to agree with the government lifting a ban on whaling for commercial purposes. “Whaling is part of my life. This job should be restarted. Japan has a culinary culture about whales,” Mitsuhiko Maeda, who has decades of hunting for whales, said. “.

However, the whaling industry is only a small industry in Japan, with about 300 participants. The industry is facing many difficulties such as rising costs and especially the declining whale meat demand of Japanese people. The Japan Fisheries Agency has allocated a budget of about 463 million USD to support whaling in fiscal year 2019.

Hunting and eating whale meat is a part of Japanese traditional culture, formed and maintained in some coastal areas for decades. The Japanese consumed the most whale meat during World War II, when other food sources became scarce.

From the late 1940s until the mid-1960s, whales were the most consumed meat in Japan. In 1964, Japan consumed 154,000 tons of whale meat.

However, this number has recently decreased significantly, as Japanese people have easier access to other foods and less and less salty with whale meat. In 2017, Japan consumes 5,000 tons of whale meat, meaning that each person in the country averages only two tablespoons of whale meat each year.

The Japanese were also enthusiastic about criticizing international environmental and animal rights organizations, when they saw whale meat being sold publicly at the market while the country had not withdrawn from IWC. Many people believe that Japan is pleading for whale fishing for scientific research purposes to maintain the industry of hunting and slaughtering this animal.

Shintaro Sato, owner of a restaurant serving whale meat in Tokyo, hopes the re-launch of whale commercial fishing will help many young people find this meat.

“I don’t think many young people now know how to cook and eat whale meat. I want more and more people to try this kind of meat once in my life,” said Hideki Abe, a whale fisherman, who said before going to sea. Many Japanese fishery officials also hope that resuming commercial fishing will make consumers more interested in whale meat.

However, Patrick Ramage, director of marine conservation at the International Animal Welfare Fund, said the move by the Japanese government is not a “magic wand” that revives the whale industry and market demand.

“The taste of the Japanese has changed,” Ramage said. “They are no longer interested in whale meat, even though the government has spent billions of yen to raise this disastrous industry. What we are seeing is just the beginning of the end of the fishing industry in Japan “.

Posted on Leave a comment

Top spots for hunting in California

Looking in California is popular in all areas of the state, but locating the proper spot to installation your stake is the important thing to achievement. several vicinity publications are to be had for hunters to seek advice from, along with the California department of Fish and wildlife internet site.
Spots in California may be carried out in pursuit of deer, waterfowl, pheasants, bears, pigs, and small mammals. areas are unique to the sort of looking, and there are many top notch spots for looking deer and chicken in California.
Public Lands for deer looking are ample, particularly in northern California, deer hunters ought to take a look at out these top spots.


The Cache Creek desolate tract location consists of greater than 70,000 acres. The place is ready 25 miles west of Williams, near the 5 freeway and Interstate 20.
Jackson country wooded area, with 48,000 acres, is placed on dual carriageway 20 near castle Bragg.
Mendocino country wide forest is placed in the Coastal Mountain variety, along the Pacific Coast from San Francisco to northern Humboldt County. extra than 900,000 forest acres are open to the general public.
Duck and ducks hunters may have fulfillment close to grasslands and refuges. vital California spots include:
China Island wildlife shelter near the San Joaquin River. The web site functions planted tests, and some are flooded. Others are left dry to attract pheasants.
Freitas national natural world safe haven is isolated and might handiest be accessed by means of boat. hunting is on Salt Slough best.
San Luis countrywide natural world refuge is south of West endure Creek. Early risers can claim existing blinds and hunters will respect the large ponds and marshlands.
Of path, every hunter has his or her preferred neighborhood spots, but traffic have to studies their intended location by using checking with kingdom fish and recreation websites and contacting nearby hunt golf equipment for advice. California gives desirable spots in each county, so plan your season and get ready for a super experience. The California branch of Fish and natural world manages over 1,000,000 acres, providing opportunities for hunting, fishing, and nature walks.

Posted on Leave a comment

Discover how to hunt and survive the African tribes

The hunting of Aboriginal tribes in Africa is very unique and varied. However, in general, these survival methods are laborious and dangerous.
Since primitive times, our ancestors have known to rely on natural mother to survive by hunting and trapping animals. Over time, early methods of survival gradually disappeared, places for farming and self-production when human society became more and more modern. However, there are still some groups of people who maintain the tribe’s hunting ways to defeat wild animals as food. The way to live and train them with great survival skills is sometimes very risky and dangerous.

Many Aboriginal tribes in Africa still rely on trapping and hunting wild animals for food. The natural environment is gradually shrinking and wildlife is often difficult to catch, forcing Aboriginal groups to come up with many unique and even dangerous methods of hunting. For example, tribes often use strange and relatively funny hunting methods to make exhausted boars and drag them into traps.

Even for the sake of living, the Aboriginal people also use their own bodies as bait to lure wild animals, in which there are typical ways to catch pythons with their feet. Among the wild creatures hunted by tribes for food, the Amazon electricity is one of the most dangerous species. This fish can release a strong current up to 900V, enough to kill an adult man.

In order to defeat this species, the Amazon Aborigines have adopted the tribal hunting method to smash a poisonous tree and dip it into the water. This way will cause the water source to be poisoned, the amount of oxygen is reduced rapidly, causing electric eels to leave the shelter. At this time, the Aboriginal people will launch a javelin or sharpened stick through the fish body and do not touch the fish even if it is dead. However, this way of hunting is still very dangerous and time consuming.

The natural environment is polluted, the amount of food decreases and the animals are too sensitive, making life more and more harsh. African Aboriginal groups even have to compete with other predators to feed. Only with rudimentary weapons like bows and arrows, spears, sticks, they are ready to plunge into the competition with dozens of hungry lions. These reckless “robberies” really make viewers shudder because sometimes, food costs the lives of the aboriginals.